Luckily this issue only affects a very minor group of users. Made after they were sent or for other risks which arise as a result of The senderĭoes not give any warranty or accept liability as the content, accuracy orĬompleteness of sent messages and accepts no responsibility for changes Information in this message that has been received in error. Immediately the sender by telephone, fax or e-mail and delete the If you are not the intended recipient, please contact Strictly forbidden except previous formal approval of the namedĪddressee(s). (Legislative Decree June, 30 2003, no.196 - Italy's New Data ProtectionĬode).Any use not in accord with its purpose, any disclosure, reproduction,Ĭopying, distribution, or either dissemination, either whole or partial, is Proprietary in nature or covered by the provisions of privacy act The attention and use of the named addressee(s) and may be confidential or The information in this message and/or attachments, is intended solely for Utilizzarlo per finalità diverse, costituisce comportamento contrario ai Conservare il messaggio stesso,ĭivulgarlo anche in parte, distribuirlo ad altri soggetti, copiarlo, od Stesso, cancellandolo dal Vostro sistema. Messaggio senza esserne il destinatario, Vi preghiamo cortesemente diĭarcene notizia via e-mail e di procedere alla distruzione del messaggio Per le finalità indicate nel messaggio stesso. Loro utilizzo è consentito esclusivamente al destinatario del messaggio, Nel/i file/s allegato/i sono da considerarsi strettamente riservate. Le informazioni contenute in questo messaggio di posta elettronica e/o GeoServer Professional Services from the experts! Visit Side in a single shot and going OOM as a result To avoid getting millions of records on the client Especially when done like GeoServer does, but setting a fetch size But beware, running queries manuallyĪnd via JDBC can sometimes lead to very different > would explain why some of the GetMap requests finish rather quickly). > features are returned, then no additional processing is required (which > additional processing of the returned features from the database. > So it seems that when you use a CQL_FILTER there is some kind of There is someone willing to spend time or funds on it, which does notĪlways correlate well with the number of users affected, believe me -) > our users would have been affected, that would never have been possible :-D > why this issue could be left untouched for half a year.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. Archives
February 2023
Categories |